Legal Opinion

Pacific Mills v. Textile Workers' Union of America, Local No. 254

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 4, 1941No. 15274PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Associate Justice Baker.

The dissenting opinion of Mr. Acting Associate Justice Thurmond gives the history of this litigation, and therefore need not be repeated here.

The “questions involved” in this appeal are stated by appellant to be:

“1. Is not a partial assignment enforcible only in equity?
“2. Will equity enforce a partial assignment where the enforcement thereof would impose substantial hardships on a debtor who has not consented to the assignment?
“3. Will the enforcement of the assignments under the facts of this case impose substantial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carwile, Rec'r v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Bryant v. Askin & Marine Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Dunbar v. JohnstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ridgeland Box Mfg. Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Murtha v. Pet Dairy Products CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  3. Ridgeland Box Mfg. Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1949
  4. Pure Milk Ass'n v. Kraft Foods Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. Space Coast Credit Union v. Walt Disney World Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API