Legal Opinion

Hubel v. Tucker

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 21, 1885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The complainant, as owner of letters patent No. 275,092, issued to him as assignee ol Taylor, April 3, 1883, files his bill alleging interference between his patent and a patent issued to William A. Tucker, No. 305,336, September 30, 1884. The prayer for relief is that the latter patent he declared void because of the al*702leged priority of invention of complainant’s assignor. The defendants, by a plea, set up as a defense that the Tucker patent was issued by the patent-office after a decision in interference proceedings between the two patents in favor of Tucker, and insist upon that decision…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Paper-Bag Mach. Co. v. CraneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1874
  2. Peck v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Hanford v. WestcottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wheaton v. KendallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API