Legal Opinion

Berry v. McFarland

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2012No. 37951-2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

In this case, a jury returned a special verdict that: (a) awarded damages against an attorney and his girlfriend based upon the jury’s finding that they had breached their fiduciary duties to a former client of the attorney by purchasing half of his stock in a closely held corporation for less than its fair market value, and (b) cancelled debts owing by the corporation to the attorney and his girlfriend based upon the jury’s finding that they had breached their fiduciary duties to a shareholder, the former client’s widow, by making loans to the corporation. The district court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hudelson v. Delta International MacHinery Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Blickenstaff v. CleggIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Gray v. Tri-Way Construction Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Warner v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H-D Transport v. Michael D. PogueIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Berry v. McFarlandIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API