McQueen v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
Defendant Steve McQueen was identified by his cousin and convicted by a jury as the killer of a man who had been missing for a year. He appeals, arguing that he was improperly detained before trial and that the trial court admitted evidence and instructed the jury incorrectly. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court.
We have jurisdiction over this direct appeal because the longest single sentence exceeds 50 years. Ind. Const, art. VII, § 4; Ind. Appellate Rule 4(A)(7).
Background
On April 3, 1996, the State charged Defendant with the murder of Jacob Lumpkin. Lumpkin had…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Marshall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Ratliff v. CohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Kokenes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Hubbard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Turner v. Sheriff of Marion CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
- Laseur v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- BATALIS v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.