Legal Opinion

McQueen v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1999No. 49S00-9709-CR-521PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Defendant Steve McQueen was identified by his cousin and convicted by a jury as the killer of a man who had been missing for a year. He appeals, arguing that he was improperly detained before trial and that the trial court admitted evidence and instructed the jury incorrectly. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court.

We have jurisdiction over this direct appeal because the longest single sentence exceeds 50 years. Ind. Const, art. VII, § 4; Ind. Appellate Rule 4(A)(7).

Background

On April 3, 1996, the State charged Defendant with the murder of Jacob Lumpkin. Lumpkin had…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Marshall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Ratliff v. CohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kokenes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hubbard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Turner v. Sheriff of Marion CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  4. Laseur v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. BATALIS v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API