Monte Cassino Wine Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Richardson, Judge:
Plaintiff states that the protest in this case has been filed for the purpose of determining “whether an importer (of merchandise transported in bond under customs supervision from a bonded warehouse on the border to a bonded warehouse at an inland port where it is entered for consumption) at an inland port had a right under the laws and regulations existing in 1944 to receive formal official notice (liquidation notice) at the inland port (like importers clearing merchandise at border ports) about the details used by the collector of customs at the inland port to determine…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- West India Oil Co. (PR) v. DomenechSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- West India Oil Co. v. SanchoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
- Bacardi Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Wong Sang Man v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Lansdowne Distillery v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.