Legal Opinion

Grant v. Tams & Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 30, 1828Published

Debt. ■Case 35. Error lo the General Court; John P. Oldham, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bibb

By the act of 12th January, 1825, (session acts, p. 156,) the general courtis prohibited fr0m taking cognizance between non-residents and chizens of this State, of smaller sums than five hundred dollars, unless by consent of parties, to be signified in writing.

Tams & Co., non-residents, in June, 1825, sued Grant, a citizen of this State, and obtained judgjn the general court, for two hundred and eighteen dollars fifty eight cents. The question is, can the jurisdiction of the court to render judgment for that sum, between these parties, be maintained by the record.

The declaration impleads the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. M'ClellandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1808
  2. Lexington Manufacturing Co. v. DorrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API