Legal Opinion
Pratt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 4, 1982No. M-79-699PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRETT, Presiding Judge:
The appellant was convicted for Keeping a Disorderly House pursuant to 21 O.S.1971, § 1026, in the District Court of Pittsburg County, Case No. M-79-463. He was sentenced to six (6) months’ imprisonment and a five hundred dollar ($500.00) fine.
The sole proposition asserted on appeal claims that the statute upon which the appellant was convicted is unconstitutionally vague. 21 O.S.1971, § 1026 provides:
Every person who keeps any disorderly house or any house of public resort by which the peace, comfort, or decency of the immediate neighborhood is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Synnott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- State v. MaddenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Isaah v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeVooght v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Casady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- State v. ThomasonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Pratt v. Oklahoma Department of AgricultureCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- State v. ThomasonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001