Hulsey v. Smith
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Presiding Justice.
The sole enumeration of error is that the court on the presentation of a petition by the appellees issued a rule nisi ordering the appellant to show cause why a temporary injunction should not be granted, and it granted a temporary restraining order ex parte. The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as being premature. Held:
Motion to dismiss is granted. Sec. 1 (a) of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; Code Ann. § 6-701) provides appeals may be taken “1. [w]here the judgment is final — that is to say- — -where the cause is no longer…
2Cited by6 opinions
- George v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Clements v. KushinkaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Krystal D. Ruemker A/K/A Krystal D. Stanley v. Raymond RuemkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Russell v. Russell Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Akins v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.