Legal Opinion
Russick v. Hicks
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 31, 1949No. 1183PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STARR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Charles Theodore Russick and Robert Lee Russick, infants four and two years of age respectively, by Theodore L. Russick as next friend, bring this action against defendant Hicks to recover damages which they allege result from his having enticed and induced their mother to leave and desert them and their family home.
In their complaint and amendment thereof plaintiffs allege that they are the children of Theodore L. Russick and Mabel Bailey Russick, who were married in 1941; that from the time of their respective births to December 31, 1947, they lived with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Tilley v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- People v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Halberg v. YoungHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
- Woods v. WillsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2005
- Bennight v. Western Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Hankins Ex Rel. Hankins v. DerbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Roth v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.