James v. State

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant Carlos James appeals his conviction on two counts of indecent liberties with a minor and three counts of third degree sexual assault.

We affirm.

ISSUES

James presents these issues for our review:

1. Whether plain error was committed when prior consistent hearsay statements from the states’ key witness were admitted, not to rebut a claim of recent fabrication, but merely to bolster the witness’ trial testimony?

2. Did the district court commit plain error when it permitted the prosecutor to repeatedly introduce evidence of appellant’s alleged gang-related activities?

3. Was…