Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Olmande

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 21, 2018No. 18-P-546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Following a Superior Court jury trial, the defendant was convicted of four counts of rape of a child and one count of indecent assault and battery on a child under the age of fourteen. After his conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, see Commonwealth v. Olmande, 84 Mass. App. Ct. 231 (2013), the defendant moved for a new trial. On appeal from the denial of that motion, the defendant contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain expert testimony, and that the prosecutor's closing argument created a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice. We affirm.2

Background.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. KolenovicMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. ShumanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Olmande v. LadouceurDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API