Legal Opinion

Barq v. Daniels

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 19, 2006No. Civil 06-370-HAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HAGGERTY, Chief Judge.

On March 16, 2006, petitioner filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [1] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(4). Petitioner alleges his removal from his originally assigned class under the Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) Drug and Acohol Treatment Program (DAP) and subsequent placement into another class that graduates on a later date violates his constitutional rights. Petitioner also filed a Motion for Interim Relief [6], requesting an expedited hearing. The court held an evidentiary hearing on April 18, 2006, in which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Nello L. Grassi v. Robert Hood, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Sheridan, OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Roderick Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Hicks v. HoodDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  5. Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. United States Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sacora v. JE THOMASDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API