Legal Opinion
Tele-Save Merchandising Company v. Consumers Distributing Company, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1987No. 86-3115PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Tele-Save Merchandising Company appeals the grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this diversity action brought under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Tele-Save’s original complaint contained four allegations against Consumers Distributing Company, Ltd.; count one, alleging violations of the Ohio Business Opportunity Plans Act, is the sole subject of this appeal. For the reasons set forth below we affirm the decision of the district court.
Tele-Save was an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Columbus, Ohio.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Schulke Radio Productions, Ltd. v. Midwestern Broadcasting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Barnes Group, Inc. v. C & C Products, Inc., and Roy E. McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Turner v. Aldens, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Jarvis v. Ashland Oil, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by79 opinions
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Modern Computer Systems, Inc. v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc. Modern Banking Systems of Southern WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Wallace Hardware Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Bill Abrams, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Muncie Power Products, Inc. v. United Technologies Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Elgar v. ElgarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.