Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. City of Dunes City

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 7, 2010No. 2008135; A144619PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Petitioner City of Dunes City (the city) seeks judicial review, and respondent Montgomery cross-petitions for judicial review, of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) in which LUBA remanded the city’s denial of respondent’s application for the approval of a preliminary subdivision plat. We reject without discussion the city’s two assignments of error concerning LUBA’s application of the substantial evidence standard and its remand for the city to interpret a provision of an erosion control ordinance. We write only to address respondent’s sole legal contention in his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. City of Happy Valley v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Big River Construction, Inc. v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Multnomah County Corrections Deputy Ass'n v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API