Legal Opinion

Daily v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 2019No. CV-18-150PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWaymond M. Brown, Judge

Appellants appeal from the circuit court's order denying their motion for reconsideration of its ruling that Justin Stanley's consent to adoption was required. On appeal, appellants argue that (1) Stanley did not meet any of the requirements of Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-9-2061 so that his consent was not required; (2) Stanley did not meet his burden under the requirements of Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-9-207,2 even if registering with the putative father registry is a "similar acknowledgement of paternity" under Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-10-120(a) ;3 and (3) Stanley was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pugh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Powell v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Racine v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Blasingame v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Shields v. KimbleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mesquite Services, LLC, Black Water Rentals, LLC, Ayric Wright, Individually, and Gene Hornbeck, Individually v. Standard E&S, LLC D/B/A Standard Energy Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API