Legal Opinion

Seibert v. Cahill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 15, 1988No. 3—87—0804PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wombacher

The plaintiff, Albert Seibert, sued the defendant, Dr. Bernard R. Cahill, alleging he was negligent in treating him for an injury he sustained in an employment-related accident. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint, ruling it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations contained in section 13 — 212 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 13-212). This appeal follows.

After being injured on July 23, 1982, the plaintiff sought treatment from Dr. Cahill, of Orthopedic Associates of Peoria, S.C. Dr. Ca-hill continuously treated the plaintiff from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. Jackson Park HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Millsaps v. Bankers Life Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Weidner v. Carle Foundation HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Roberson v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. First National Bank of Joliet v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weber v. CuetoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Flynn v. SzwedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Chicago Trust Co. v. CherukuriAppellate Court of Illinois · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API