Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Rochman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1988No. 52877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment concerning numerous matters in this probate estate. Among other things, appellant Reva Paul Epstein’s request to remove the personal representative was denied, as was her attempt to void a sale of personal property.

The trial judge heard testimony for eight days. After receiving memorandum from the parties, the judge filed nine pages of detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. A detailed opinion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marriage of Andrews v. AndrewsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eldon Bugg v. James L. Rutter, Jean Goldstein, and Christy BlakemoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Emery v. EmeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Hoefer v. HoeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API