Legal Opinion
Brunette v. Bierke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1955PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
With respect to the question of the verdict which inquired whether Peters was on the sidewalk when struck, the court instnicted the jury as follows:
“It appears that there was a concrete sidewalk, five feet wide, running along the west side of the filling-station property, and this is the sidewalk referred to in this question. Plaintiff was either on the sidewalk when struck or on the highway known as Oak Grove avenue. You are instructed that the apron leading from the sidewalk to Oak Grove avenue on the west side of the filling station was a part of the highway. If you find that plaintiff was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chase v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Weber v. MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- State ex rel. McManman v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Bassil v. FayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Hayes v. RoffersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by17 opinions
- Moran v. Quality Aluminum Casting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Muskego-Norway Consolidated Schools Joint School District No. 9 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WachsmuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Pedersen v. BlessingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Gordon v. Burgess Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.