Legal Opinion

Crudup v. Roseboom

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921No. 21634PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On motion to modify tbe correct judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

Ethridge, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

This cause was affirmed on a former day at this term of court, and a suggestion of error overruled.

This so-called motion to modify and correct tbe judgment heretofore rendered is, in effect, nothing more than a suggestion of error. It was insisted in tbe motion that tbe record shows that tbe appellee was indebted to tbe appellant, and that we should have rendered judgment for tbe amount tbe appellee owed tbe appellant as evidenced by exhibits to the bill, which tbe answer of tbe defendant admits to be owing. Tbe exhibits are, first, a note for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Couret v. ConnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shipman v. LovelaceMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Richmond v. Van's Moving & Storage Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Home Owners Loan Corp. v. WigginsMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API