Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Boughton

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1987No. C9-86-1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Appellant Paula Sanders contends the family court lacked jurisdiction to vacate or amend provisions of a referee’s order because respondent Robert Boughton did not follow established appellate procedures. We vacate the district court order.

FACTS

In April 1986, Sanders initiated a paternity action alleging Boughton is the father of a child born to Sanders on November 12, 1982. On September 18, 1986, a family court referee, upon Boughton’s admission of paternity, awarded Sanders physical custody of the child and ordered Boughton to pay child support and arrearages. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blixt v. Civil Service Bd., State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Marriage of Koponen v. KoponenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API