Legal Opinion
In re Bear River Drainage District
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1959No. Misc. No. 3PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
The United States has applied for the authorization of an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).
The State Engineer of Utah instituted proceedings in the district court of Cache County, Utah, to adjudicate rights to the use of all the waters within the Bear River drainage in Utah. Pursuant to 43 U.S.C.A. § 666, a summons was served upon a representative of the Attorney General of the United States. On petition of the United States the case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The State Engineer moved to remand and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States Alkali Export Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pacific Live Stock Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Wtc Disaster Site.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Chism v. National Heritage Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Jerry Wayne Watts v. John T. Hadden, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Appalachian Volunteers, Inc. v. Charles Clark, Edward Lee Blankenship v. Clarles ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Yarbrough v. BlakeDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.