Legal Opinion

LaPlante v. Vasquez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 17, 2012No. AC 33373PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

To encourage the settlement of civil cases, General Statutes § 52492a1 imposes sanctions on litigants who reject reasonable settlement offers by authorizing a trial court to order the payment of interest on a judgment if the amount recovered by the plaintiff exceeds or is equal to an offer of compromise tendered by the plaintiff and rejected by the defendant. See, e.g., Branford v. Santa Barbara, 294 Conn. 803, 816, 988 A.2d 221 (2010). The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether, pursuant to § 52492a, the trial court properly awarded interest on the $250,000 judgment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Kowal v. HofherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Gionfriddo v. Gartenhaus CafeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Gionfriddo v. Gartenhaus CafeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Regan v. ReganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Barton v. NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Emerick v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API