Legal Opinion
Horsman Dolls, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 25, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hei-iek, J.
The subject of controversy here is the validity of the contribution rate assigned to the plaintiff employer for the year 1942 under R. S. 43 :21-1, el seq.
The employers’ rate of contribution to the fund created by this statute for the alleviation of economic insecurity due to involuntary unemployment, by the maintenance of purchasing power during periods of unemployment, is based on benefit experience. Benefits paid out of the fund on the subject employer’s behalf constitute a basic factor in the computation of the rate. Under subsections 7…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Winona & St. Peter Land Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Security Trust & Safety Vault Co. v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Pittsburgh &C. Railway v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Continental Oil Co. v. Board of Labor AppealsMontana Supreme Court · 1978
- Community Affairs Dep't v. WertheimerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Malady v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMP. SECURITYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- In Re ShackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- STATE, DEP v. Larchmont FarmsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.