Legal Opinion

In re Maracina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 26, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

*98OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Richard P. Maracina, was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the Second Judicial Department as Richard Paul Maracina on December 16, 1969. At all times relevant herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Respondent was suspended, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i), from the practice of law pending determination of this disciplinary proceeding on the ground of his failure to cooperate with the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC). (Matter of Maracina, 146 AD2d 378.)

At the hearing…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re BingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re MaracinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API