Bumpers v. Cmty. Bank of N. Va.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentJustice Beasley
When the undisputed facts demonstrate that defendant bank charged plaintiffs for a service not actually provided, plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment on their unfair and deceptive practice claim. Because the majority mischaracterizes the basis for plaintiffs’ claim to be a misrepresentation and concludes that summary judgment was improperly granted for plaintiffs, I respectfully dissent.
This case involves several issues: (1) whether proof of actual reliance is required to recover; (2) whether there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether plaintiffs received discounted…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.