Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bumpers v. Cmty. Bank of N. Va.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 28, 2013No. 269PA09-2Published

1DissentJustice Beasley

When the undisputed facts demonstrate that defendant bank charged plaintiffs for a service not actually provided, plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment on their unfair and deceptive practice claim. Because the majority mischaracterizes the basis for plaintiffs’ claim to be a misrepresentation and concludes that summary judgment was improperly granted for plaintiffs, I respectfully dissent.

This case involves several issues: (1) whether proof of actual reliance is required to recover; (2) whether there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether plaintiffs received discounted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API