Legal Opinion

State v. Almeida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 28, 1997No. 89821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a district court decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

DO THE PRINCIPLES ANNOUNCED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN DAVIS [v. UNITED STATES, 512 U.S. 452, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994)], APPLY TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CONFESSIONS IN FLORIDA, IN LIGHT OF TRAYLOR [v. STATE, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992) ]?

Almeida v. State, 687 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

In State v. Owen, 696 So.2d 715 (Fla.1997), we answered this question in the affirmative. Accordingly, consistent with Owen,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. State v. OwenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. Almeida v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Almeida v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. MX INVESTMENTS INC. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API