State v. Almeida
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review a district court decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance:
DO THE PRINCIPLES ANNOUNCED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN DAVIS [v. UNITED STATES, 512 U.S. 452, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994)], APPLY TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CONFESSIONS IN FLORIDA, IN LIGHT OF TRAYLOR [v. STATE, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992) ]?
Almeida v. State, 687 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
In State v. Owen, 696 So.2d 715 (Fla.1997), we answered this question in the affirmative. Accordingly, consistent with Owen,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. OwenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Almeida v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Almeida v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- MX INVESTMENTS INC. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1997