Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Starbucks Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 31, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01178Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELIZABETH ANDERSON, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-01178-JD individually and on behalf of all others 8 similarly situated, ORDER RE REMAND Plaintiffs, 9 Re: Dkt. No. 13 v. 10 11 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant. 12 13 Named plaintiffs Anderson and several others have sued Starbucks Corporation on behalf 14 of a putative class of store managers to recover cell phone costs and fees incurred on the job. 15 Plaintiffs filed this action under California state law in the Alameda County Superior Court. Dkt. 16 No. 1-2. Starbucks…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jose Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of AzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Blanca Argelia Arias v. Residence Inn by MarriottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Delores Lewis v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Nancy A. COTTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.