Legal Opinion

Carman v. Harrah

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — No». Frank G. Johnson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

This is a suit brought November 7, 1912, to recover a cash payment of $1556.20' made by plaintiff on a contract, dated June 8, 1907, for the purchase of certain land in Texas.

The contract was signed by plaintiff and defendant, but the land was in fact owned by The International Land Company, a corporation, of which the defendant, Miss Mary Harrah, was secretary and treasurer. The company had an office in Kansas City, Missouri. The land was in defaudant’s name because, under the laws of Texas, a foreign corporation could not own land in that State for speculative purposes.

The theory to which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lanitz v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Housekeeper Pub. Co. v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. Chouteau v. Jupiter Iron WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. Chrisman v. HodgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  5. Montgomery v. American Central InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Labor Discount Center, Inc. v. State Bank & Trust Co. of WellstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Priest v. OehlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Place v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. Miller v. DeahlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. George Gifford Co. v. John N. WillmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API