City of Kansas City v. Chastain
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.
Karen Chastain and additional members of a “Committee of Petitioners” (collectively, “Chastain”) appeal a judgment declaring that a proposed ordinance initiative petition violates article III, section 51 of the Missouri Constitution because the initiative was used for the appropriation of money. Chastain also appeals the dismissal of her counterclaim for mandamus.
The proposed ordinance does not appropriate money and, therefore, does not violate article III, section 51 of the Missouri Constitution. The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded.
Facts
Kansas City…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- J.C.W. Ex Rel. Webb v. WyciskallaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process v. BluntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Levinson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Kansas City v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jim Boeving, Patty Arrowood, Robert E. Pund, and Robert A. Klein v. Missouri Secretary of State Jason Kander, Raise Your Hand for Kids, and Erin BrowerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- State ex rel. Hawley v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Century Motor Corporation v. FCA US LLC, and Edwin BergenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Anita Marie Kuehner v. Jason KanderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Laura Reeves v. Jason Kander and John Watson and Returning Government to the People and Todd S. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.