Legal Opinion

New Hampshire v. Maine

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 14, 1976No. 64 ORIGPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

426 U.S. 363 (1976)

NEW HAMPSHIRE

v.

MAINE.

No. 64, Orig.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 19, 1976.

Decided June 14, 1976.

ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER.

Richard F. Upton argued the cause for plaintiff on exceptions to the Report of the Special Master. With him on the briefs were Warren B. Rudman, Attorney General of New Hampshire, and David H. Souter, Deputy Attorney General.

Edward F. Bradley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of Maine, argued the cause for defendant on exceptions to the Report. With him on the briefs were Joseph E. Brennan, Attorney General, and Donald G.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Brennan; Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Wharton v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Texas v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Vermont v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API