Legal Opinion

McKelvey v. McKelvey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 1990No. 89-234Published

1Per curiam

There is ample, although disputed, evidence which supports the trial judge’s action in upholding the validity of the parties’ antenuptial agreement, see Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d 330 (Fla.1987); Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 143 So.2d 17 (Fla.1962); Bubenik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), as well as the other determinations challenged on this appeal. We are therefore bound to uphold the final judgment entered below in all respects. Marsh v. Marsh, 419 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla.1982); Strawgate v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112, 1113 (Fla.1976); Chakford v. Strum, 87 So.2d 419, 420 (Fla.1956).

Aff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Del Vecchio v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Casto v. CastoSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Marsh v. MarshSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Strawgate v. TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Chakford v. StrumSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API