Legal Opinion

Kanter & Eisenberg v. Madison Associates

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 18, 1986No. 85-2012PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Defendants are appealing from an order of the chancery court enjoining them from instituting a forcible entry and detainer action against the plaintiff and requiring them to remit plaintiff’s disputed rental payments to an escrow account.

On June 30, 1980, the law firm of Kanter & Eisenberg (K&E) entered into a lease agreement with Madison Associates (Madison). K&E agreed with Madison’s managing partner, Hines Chicago Associates, Ltd., to rent a full floor in the Three First National Plaza building. The lease provided that the tenant must pay both a “Base Rental” and an “Additional Rental.”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jack Spring, Inc. v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Best Coin-Op, Inc. v. Old Willow Falls Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Alexander v. Standard Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Peoria Housing Authority v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Re Marriage of SchwartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kanter & Eisenberg v. Madison AssociatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Radiac Abrasives, Inc. v. Diamond Technology, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Daiwa Bank, Ltd. v. La Salle National Trust, N.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Design Studio International, Inc. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Northwest Podiatry Center, LTD. v. OchwatAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API