Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Eisner
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 17, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harry GK Herman, S.
The court is asked to construe decedent’s will, more particularly article “ twenty-first ” thereof:
“ I hereby give and devise and bequeath all the rest, remainder and residue of my estate, both real property and personal property, wherever the same may be situated and I hereby direct that the same may be divided into as many equal parts as I shall have children me surviving; and I hereby give one of such undivided equal parts to each of my children me surviving share and share alike; with the exception that in apportioning the share that would go to my beloved child Joseph…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pimel v. . BetjemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- In Re the Probate of the Will of TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Matter of CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lightfoot v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In re the Accounting of PeeblesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of SprossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- In re BNY MellonNew York Surrogate's Court · 2014