Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Eisner

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 17, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harry GK Herman, S.

The court is asked to construe decedent’s will, more particularly article “ twenty-first ” thereof:

“ I hereby give and devise and bequeath all the rest, remainder and residue of my estate, both real property and personal property, wherever the same may be situated and I hereby direct that the same may be divided into as many equal parts as I shall have children me surviving; and I hereby give one of such undivided equal parts to each of my children me surviving share and share alike; with the exception that in apportioning the share that would go to my beloved child Joseph…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pimel v. . BetjemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. In Re the Probate of the Will of TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Matter of CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Lightfoot v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. In re the Accounting of PeeblesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SprossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  2. In re BNY MellonNew York Surrogate's Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API