Legal Opinion

LOO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1969No. 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1952 MATTER OF Loo In Deportation Proceedings A-11407844 Decided by Board January 10, and April .9, 1969 Since the annulment of a judicial judgment of citizenship obtained by fraud in a proceeding under section 503, Nationality Act of 1940, does not per- mit the individual concerned to be regarded as an alien during the time the judgment was in effect, respondent is not deportable on a no visa charge relating to an entry as a U.S. citizen which occurred during s. time when such a judicial judgment was in effect. CHARGE : Order: Act of 1952—Section 241 (a) (1) [8 U.S.C. 1251…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Costello v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Francesco Brancato v. John M. Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. United States ex rel. Brancato v. LehmannDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GUEVARABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1991
  2. LOOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  3. PIOQUINTOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API