T. Aucoin & Sons v. Young

Triehe, the first defendant, filed an exception of no right or cause of' action, which was overruled. This ruling is not questioned.

Triehe then filed an answer putting at issue plaintiff's alleged title, alleging among other defenses that plaintiff had not paid the price ’of the land to Montet.

Triehe, tenant of Young, retired from the defense and Young tdbk his place as defendant.

Mr. Young filed an answer admitting that plaintiffs had bought the property from Montet, but denies that their title is good, because of non-payment of the purchase price to Montet; admits that Montet had title from…