Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. Robinson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1984PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division that there is no tender of evidence sufficient to support the contention that Robinson was an employee of Scodek. Nor was any evidence tendered from which it could be concluded that *898Scodek was negligent in selecting Robinson as an independent contractor or in delegating to him responsibility for delivery of the trailer to a construction site. Finally, the fact that Scodek’s president passed the disabled tractor trailer some hours before the accident and gave…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Pannone v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- DeFeo v. Frank Lambie, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kavulak v. Laimis Juodzevicius, A.V. Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Carrion v. Orbit Messenger, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Eastern Airlines v. Joseph Guida & Sons Trucking Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.