Legal Opinion

Wescott v. Catencamp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

The court was doubtless led to sustain the objection made to the introduction of further proof by the fact that the order denying the application to intervene contained findings upon some of the issues raised by the pleadings in this action. Such findings were a basis for the exercise of the court’s discretion in determining whether the petition to intervene should be granted, but they did not finally determine the merits of the claims of any party to this action or to the divorce action in such manner that such party could review that determination upon appeal from the order denying the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hart v. MoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Jackson Milling Co. v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Kimberly-Clark Co. v. Patten Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Sliter v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Coleman v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kusick v. KusickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Thelen v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API