Legal Opinion

Golden Panagia Steamship, Inc. v. Panama Canal Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1986No. Nos. 83-3186, 85-3168PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING L. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

It is sometimes said that “two ships passing in the night” is a bad thing. This case proves that the opposite result — two ships colliding in broad daylight — may not always be desirable either. When such a meeting of minds, men, and machinery occurs in the Panama Canal, the situation becomes even more complicated than usual. Appellant Golden Panagia sued the responsible American authorities in the U.S. District Court in Panama for $300,000 in damages to its ship — only to have its attorney “settle” the case for $195,000 and pocket the cash, never to be heard…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bankers Mortgage Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Cia Anon Venezolana De Navegacion v. Frank L. Harris and Pate Stevedoring Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Holker v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  5. Billy Canipe v. National Loss Control Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golden Panagia Steamship, Inc. v. The Panama Canal Commission and the United States of America, Golden Panagia Steamship, Inc. v. The United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API