Legal Opinion

Brown v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 5, 1931No. Docket No. 29456Published

The petitioner, an attorney, gave up private practice to become an assistant attorney general of a State, taking charge of a criminal investigation conducted by the attorney general. Held, that his compensation is not subject to Federal income tax.

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK A. BROWN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Brown v. Commissioner

Docket No. 29456.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

22 B.T.A. 581; 1931 BTA LEXIS 2102;

March 5, 1931, Promulgated

The petitioner, an attorney, gave up private practice to become an assistant attorney general of a State, taking charge of a criminal investigation conducted by the attorney general. Held, that his compensation is not subject to Federal income tax.

Thomas P. Dudley, Esq., for the petitioner.

C. A. Ray, Esq., for the respondent.

PHILLIPS

The Commissioner asserted a deficiency in income…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API