Legal Opinion
Deto Laboratory, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided February 15, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
These three actions came before the court on an agreed statement of facts. In each action the plaintiff, a health service provider, alleges that defendant did not pay first-party no-fault benefits when due and the amount sought to be recovered in each is under $100. Before the matters came on for trial, the respective claims were paid.
The only issue now before the court is the amount of legal fees plaintiff is entitled to recover. Plaintiff claims it is entitled to the reasonable value of its counsel’s fees, which the parties stipulated was $750 in each…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & BarriosNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Marangiello v. KamakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Rachlin v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samuel J. Roth, M. D., P. C. v. Hanover InsuranceSuffolk County District Court · 1984
- Scheiner v. Empire Mutual InsuranceNassau County District Court · 1983
- Deto Laboratory, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1984
- Staten Island Hospital v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNassau County District Court · 1984