Sterling v. Marietta & Susquehanna Trading Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
IN ERROR. This case came before the Court on a writ of error to the Common • Pleas of Dauphin county, with which several bills of exceptions were returned, as well to the rejection of evidence as to the charge of the court below. who cited, Juniata Bankv. Brown, 5 Serg. <$• Bawle, 226. Phill. 34. note. 1 Dali. 254. 4 Serg. %■ Bawle, 399. and by
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court, which states fully all the facts material to the case, and the points of law arising upon them, was delivered by
Tilghman, C. J.
This is an action brought by the “ The Marietta and Susquehanna Trading Company,” against Daniel Sterling, the plaintiff in error, on a promissory note, for 1350 dollars, dated June 16tb, 1814, drawn by Wait S. Skinner, payable to t}ie said Daniel Sterling, or order, at Henry CasseVs banking house, one hundred and seventeen days after date, and indorsed by the said Sterling and Christian Shirk. This note was regularly protested for…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bank of Northern Liberties v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
- Deck v. WorksNew York Supreme Court · 1879
- Elias v. Teill, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1836