Legal Opinion

Cool v. Reed

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 14, 1986No. 67821PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Judge.

Appeal by two heirs from the dismissal of their will contest action because it was barred by § 473.083, RSMo Supp.1984. The issue is whether an heir may constitutionally be barred from filing a will contest by the limitations provisions of § 473.083 when no actual notice has been given to the heir of admission of a will to probate and the consequent limited right of contest. No such notice is required to be given by the statute. As to appellant Cool modified; as to appellant Volpe, affirmed.

Alyee Michelson died on March 24, 1983. She was survived by a half-sister, Anny Reed, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Estate of Busch v. Ferrell-Duncan Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Haas v. HaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. Cool v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chaney v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Brents v. ParrishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Bosworth v. SewellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Bosworth v. SewellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API