Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Burger v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1995No. 94-KH-1578PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In re Burger, Brett; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 315-426.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded. The timeliness provisions of C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A) do not apply to motions to correct illegal sentences properly made under La.C.Cr.P. art. 882, which states that illegal sentences “may be corrected at any time.” State ex rel. Foucha v. Cr.D.C., 93-1001 (La. 9/2/94), 642 So.2d 1274; State ex rel. Johnson v. Day, 92-0122 (La. 5/13/94), 637 So.2d 1062. The district court is therefore ordered to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Stepter v. WhitleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  3. State v. DesdunesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MeadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. State v. GibsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. State ex rel. Nicholas v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API