Legal Opinion

Gaynor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 6, 1988No. 87-2387Published

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

This case was previously before this court. Gaynor v. State, 505 So.2d 467 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We expressly held “Entry into an occupied dwelling is an essential element of [the crime charged]” and cannot be used as a reason to justify departure from the guidelines sentence. Id. at 469.

It is clear from the transcript that the trial court expressly refused to follow this court’s mandate in Gaynor. We reverse appellant’s sentence and remand with an order that the learned trial judge below resentence appellant within the guidelines.

The arguments on appeal concerning…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Gaynor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API