Legal Opinion

Ciaccio v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1984No. Civ. 30565PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, Acting P. J.

Petitioners were examined and committed pursuant to Penal Code section 872 1 on a felony complaint charging a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11351 (possession for sale of a narcotic). They sought section 995 relief on section 1382, subdivision l 2 and other grounds when real party failed to file the superior court information within 15 days of the section 872 order as required by section 739. 3 Although real party failed to present facts sufficient to excuse the late filing, respondent determined counsel’s mute acquiescence in the arraignment date…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. TrujilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Bright v. GinesteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Superior CourtAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2003
  2. Osman v. Appellate DivisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Osman v. APPELLATE DIV. OF SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Salari v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API