Van Brunt v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ARTHUR H. VAN BRUNT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Van Brunt v. Commissioner
Docket No. 12444.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
11 B.T.A. 406; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3816;
April 3, 1928, Promulgated
John Drye, Jr., Esq., for the petitioner.
James L. Backstrom, Esq., for the respondent.
LITTLETON
The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $1,526.64 for the year 1919. Petitioner claims that the Commissioner erred in including in his income the amount of $2,399.92, rent, and $5,776 dividends.
FINDINGS OF FACT.
During the calendar year 1919, petitioner received rent in the amount…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Van Brunt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928