Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Shihada
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, Judge.
The appellant was the garnishee in an action after judgment. The appellee, gar-nishor, was the plaintiff in the principal action. The appellant, an insurance company, appeals the final judgment in garnishment upon the ground that the evidence before the trial judge established as a matter of law that the insurance contract was violated by the tort-feasor’s failure to co-operate.
The evidence relied upon in an attempt to establish that the findings of the trial judge are against the manifest weight of the evidence is: (1) Two written statements of the tort-feasor taken by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Fire and Casualty Company v. VlietSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. LingleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. ShihadaSupreme Court of Florida · 1968