Ex parte Nichols
California Supreme Court
Hearing in the Supreme Court upon writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The petitioner,William Nichols, asks, on a writ of habeas corpus, to be discharged, from the custody of Carl Bank, superintendent of the Preston School of Industry, situated in Amador county. He was convicted in a justice’s court of petit larceny, and, being under the age of eighteen years, the justice ad*653judged that he was a fit subject for commitment to said school, suspended judgment, and committed him to said school until he should be twenty-one years old, unless, sooner legally discharged. The commitment was approved by the superior judge of the county, as provided by section 16 of an act…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mill v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In re a Writ of Habeas Corpus for SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Wissenburg v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- In Re PowellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.