State Ex Rel. Dunn v. Griffith
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentLovins, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the Courts’ conclusions in this proceeding.
I think that the relators are entitled to a writ of mandamus as hereinafter stated. The question presented in this proceeding is cognate to the question which was before this Court in the case of State v. Bouchelle, 137 W. Va. 572, 73 S. E. 2d 432.
In the Bouchelle case, the Circuit Court of Kanawha County was prohibited from requiring the state to amend its petition in a proceeding in eminent domain. The facts presented in the case of State v. Bouchelle, supra, disclose that there were three parcels of land adjacent to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Smith v. BlachleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Stewart v. State Road Commission of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hardy v. SimpsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Abell v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Mahone v. State Road CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.