State v. Consolidated Virginia Mining Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, Storey County. The facts are stated in the opinion. 1. There is nothing conclusive or even applicable to this appeal in the former decision; as this proceeds upon a different state of facts, and is to be governed by different sections of the statute. There may be dicta in such opinion applicable to the entire statute, but .they do not constitute any portion of the law of the case.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, Storey County. The facts are stated in the opinion. 1. There is nothing conclusive or even applicable to this appeal in the former decision; as this proceeds upon a different state of facts, and is to be governed by different sections of the statute. There may be dicta in such opinion applicable to the entire statute, but .they do not constitute any portion of the law of the case. (Mulford v. Hstudillo, 32 Cal. 138.) The same questions are not presented in the present appeal, as will appear by the record in the former . case, so…
1Opinion of the Court
By tbe Court,
Leonard, C. J. :
On tbe twenty-seventh of April, 1878, judgment herein was modified in the court below according to a previous order of this court. (13 Nev. 229.)
September 1, 1880, appellants moved the court for an order directing tbe satisfaction of said judgment on payment of the amount of all taxes and costs included in tbe same, exclusive of tbe penalties and percentage, in pursuance of tbe fourth section of a statute of this state, approved March 17, 1879, entitled, “An act to discontinue litigation touching inequitable claims for taxes .and penalties.” (Stat. 1879, 144.)
Tbe…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holden v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- City of Atchison v. BartholowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
- Ex parte PritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Evans v. JobNevada Supreme Court · 1873
- State v. California Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Redford v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Esser v. SpauldingNevada Supreme Court · 1883
- Evans v. NorvellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- State ex rel. Wolf v. Pullman Palace Car Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1883
- Lane v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.